Due to disinvestment, population loss and exclusionary housing policies, Detroit’s housing market has experienced distress. There is a need for quality affordable rental housing. However, for many first-time homeowners, conventional long-term rental strategies may prove insufficient, and many communities are likely to want to sustain a substantial level of homeownership in the long turn. Alternative models such as lease-to-purchase programs can offer an intermediate step to the housing issues that Detroit faces.
The Lease-Purchase Contract
This model allows households to rent a home for a period of
time before taking on the mortgage or ownership of the property. During the
lease period, the renter has exclusive rights to purchase the home. Although
the details contained within a contract vary widely based on local customs,
nonprofit goals, tenant needs, funding restrictions, and state regulations,
they are generally structured the same.[1] The length of the
lease period, the rental payment and how it is allocated, the determination of
the final purchase price, and the fees associated with the program are some of
the key features of the contract
Nonprofit Models
Since the 1980s and early 1990s,
the lease-purchase product has been used by nonprofits to create an affordable
and sustainable pathway to homeownership. Combined with other housing programs,
these lease–purchase arrangements provide opportunities for nonprofits in Detroit
to help contribute to redevelopment of the City.
-
Cleveland Housing Network (CHN) Lease-Purchase Program[2] was one of the most successful models. CHN has been
operating a lease-purchase program using Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
financing since 1987.[3] What
makes CHN so successful in the execution of their approach is their effective
property management, the work with individual households around the needs of
each family, and the innovative and flexible financing CHN has designed.
Detroit programs can incorporate CHN’s successful strategy and provide LIHTC
financing for families living in single family homes to help them achieve
affordable homeownership. Nonprofits can utilize the learnings of CHN’s
lease-purchase work while adjusting for the particular needs for the residents
of the City of Detroit and for the operational and experience of the particular
organizations.
-
The Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation[4] developed the Learn,
Earn, Own program to help low-and-moderate-income
households purchase homes while stabilizing neighborhoods under the federal
Neighborhood Stabilization Program. An eligible household works with a real
estate agent to select a single-family home in greater Denver that is a
foreclosure or real estate owned (REO)
property,[5] is
priced below market value, and meets minimum quality standards, needing only
minor rehab. With funding from Neighborhood Housing Services of America, the
nonprofit purchases, repairs, and then leases the home.[6] In CRHDC’s self-help program,
participants contribute significant “sweat equity” towards the construction of
their home, bringing down development costs and producing a more affordable
home.[7] The sweat
equity model used by CRHDC can be replicated by Detroit programs to make a home
more affordable.
-
Center for Community Self-Help[8], a community development financial institution (CDFI) in
North Carolina, developed a model in which nonprofits would buy homes in
neighborhoods with high vacancy and foreclosure rates, rehabilitate them, and
then rent them under a lease-purchase structure. In this way, lease-purchase
would support neighborhood stabilization as well as allow families to rebuild
their credit and financial stability after foreclosure or job loss. Self-Help
recognizes that the local program needs to be responsive to the local context
and would provide for an opportunity to develop program parameters to best meet
the conditions in Detroit. This program could be useful in Detroit for programs
that have sufficient capacity to run them, particularly as Detroit Land Bank
seeks to return homes to use.
-
The success of these programs
is dependent on understanding all the costs associated with the program, an
effective organizational strategy, a strong lease-purchase contract, clear
communication with the tenant, ongoing
education, and an exit strategy that considers all the possibilities.
Regulation Issues
Lease-purchase
transactions are covered by a patchwork of state
laws. This scarcity of regulation is due in
part to the market dominance of more traditional methods of homeownership, and
the complexity of the lease-purchase approach.[9] Legal gray areas can create
opportunities for misunderstandings between the nonprofit and lease-purchasers.
In addition, lease-to-own agreements do not benefit from protections
against third-party liens on the property.
Because lease-purchase contracts do not involve mortgages
or initial transfers of ownership, they are not subject to federal consumer
protection laws such as the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) or the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), which prohibit various unscrupulous
activities such as kickbacks between different parties in the home search and
purchase process. Additionally, lease-purchase
buyers have far fewer rights during the lease period. Finally, most states have
few protections for lease-purchase buyers in terms of retaining some of the equity or down payment that accumulated during
the lease period in the event of an unsuccessful ownership conversion. One broad type of recommendation is to extend
mortgagor protections to lease-purchase buyers including the right to cure, the
right to a foreclosure sale and the right to excess profits from any
foreclosure sale. Some states have extended some mortgagor-type protections
to contract-for-deed buyers, such as rights of redemption, the right to receive
restitution for the installment payments or improvements to the property.
Conclusion
Responsible nonprofit lease-purchase programs can be
an important part of efforts to provide affordable housing while stabilizing
declining or threatened neighborhoods. At the same time, stronger regulations
are needed to ensure that for-profit lease-purchase
programs operate in a responsible manner. This framework and strategies could
be a starting place for the nonprofits in Detroit to develop and refine more
specific policy and program interventions.
[1] Id.
[5] Real
estate owned, is a term used to describe a class of property owned by a lender.
[6]
https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/88656/detroit_path_forward_finalized.pdf
[9] Way, Heather K. 2009. Informal Homeownership in the United
States and the Law. St. Louis University Public Law Review, XXIX, 113-192.
Retrieved November 30, 2010 at https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/hway/informal-homeownership.pdf
By: Nelius Wanjohi