Skip to main content

Should Your Companies Have a Parent-Subsidiary Relationship or Stay Wholly Separate Entities?

  



Creating a second company is an exciting venture and will entail taking many of the same steps as when you created your first company. However, there may also be some new questions you have to consider when getting started, a primary one being: what kind of legal organizational relationship, if any, do you want your new company to have to your existing one? You can choose to keep your companies as completely separate entities that have no legal relationship to each other, or you can choose to link them in a parent-subsidiary relationship. There are multiple factors to consider when choosing whether or not to form a parent-subsidiary relationship, some of which will be addressed in this post.

What is a Parent-Subsidiary Relationship?

A parent-subsidiary relationship is created when one company (the “parent”) controls another company (the “subsidiary”). This is typically created when the parent owns a controlling amount of stock or shares in the subsidiary company, meaning that they have majority voting power over the subsidiary. A parent can be either sole shareholder or majority shareholder of its subsidiary. So, if you are hoping to include other members or shareholders in your new company venture, you are not necessarily prevented from doing so just because your new company is a subsidiary. As sole or majority shareholder, the parent can exert control over the subsidiary by voting to approve or remove the subsidiary’s board members and vote on certain major decisions on how the subsidiary operates. But, as the subsidiary is still its own legal entity, it has its own aspects of control that keep it separated from the parent. Despite the parent’s voting power over the subsidiary’s board, the subsidiary’s directors and officers are still responsible for managing the company and acting in the subsidiary’s best interests.

Some Factors to Consider When Deciding on a Parent-Subsidiary Relationship

One question you need to ask yourself is whether you want one of the companies to have influence over the other. As mentioned above, a parent company gets that title by owning a majority of shares in the subsidiary to give it some control over the subsidiary. Do you want your existing company to have a controlling interest and make decisions for your new company, or do you prefer that the activities and decisions are conducted separately? If you want or don’t mind a controlling relationship, then parent-subsidiary may be preferable, but if you do not want that, then keeping the companies completely separate is likely the option for you.

Another major factor is choice of entity for both companies. The current entity structure of your existing company (we’ll call that “Company A”) and the entity structure you hope to use for your new company (let’s call that “Company B”) can affect whether a parent-subsidiary relationship is even possible. Only certain entity types can own or be owned by other companies. For example, a subsidiary cannot be an S Corporation. This is because S Corporations cannot have businesses as shareholders; only real people can be shareholders in an S Corporation. So if Company A is already an S Corporation, then you cannot structure Company B to be the parent of A. Similarly, if you want Company B to be the subsidiary, you cannot structure it as an S Corporation. Other entities, like C Corporations and LLCs are not restricted like this and can be owned by a parent company. Both C Corporations and LLCs can also be parent companies themselves, although it is far more common to see parent companies structured as C Corporations.

Now, hearing about this relationship between two companies may raise questions for you about whether the two companies’ liabilities are becoming entangled. Typically, parent companies will not be held liable for the actions of its subsidiary, assuming that their business activities are also kept separate. However, this liability protection does not exactly go both ways. While a parent can usually be protected from liability if the subsidiary is sued, if the parent company is sued, then its ownership interests in the subsidiary are considered the parent’s property and could be at risk. So if your parent company is at high risk of being sued (or at least at a higher risk than the subsidiary), you might not want to risk your other company by making it a subsidiary.

As mentioned above, parent companies can be protected from their subsidiary’s liabilities if they keep their business activities distinct from that of the subsidiary. An easy way to keep liabilities as separate as possible is to keep all assets, like properties and finances, separate between the companies. You will need to be careful to not have the companies share a common bank account, shared marketing materials, or doing business under each other’s names. (Of course, this is also true even if there is no parent-sub relationship.) If you do, you may risk losing the liability protections between the companies. This can be especially tricky when you are still in the process of creating your second company, especially if you have been getting a boost from your first company, whether it’s financial, reputational, etc. So, as soon as you know that you want to create a new company, you need to do your best to separate out the assets, finances, and activities of your separate companies and make relevant parties aware of the separation. For example, when speaking with potential investors or applying for grants, you need to make clear which business you are representing in that moment. All assets should be clearly delineated between the companies and should only be used by the company that officially owns it. The two companies should have separate bank accounts, and you need to be careful how you market the companies in relation to one another. Regardless of whether the companies are parent-subsidiary or completely independent of each other, you need to conduct the businesses clearly and separately from each other to not muddy the waters and risk losing liability protections.

The relationship – if any – between the companies is one of many considerations you will need to consider when creating a second business. Be sure to consult with an attorney for tailored legal advice to ensure that you protect your existing company and structure your new company properly.


By Olivia Filed


Popular posts from this blog

What's in a Name? A Short & Sweet Guide to Michigan's Entity Name Rules

  Part 1: Introduction You have decided to create a business entity in Michigan, congratulations!   One of the most important steps in entity formation is choosing a name—it tells the state and the public a lot about your business.   Maybe you already know what name you want to choose.   Maybe you are overwhelmed by all of the rules you have seen online.   Maybe you fall into both (or neither) of those categories. Keep reading to learn more about what you may and must include in your business’s name, what you cannot include in your business’s name, and where to find additional resources. Part 2: The Dos You May. . .             Often, the name is the first thing consumers see about a business.   Because first impressions are so important, it is a great idea for your business’s name to be a reflection of the service(s) you provide, your business’s mission, or some other related facet of your business. For example, under § 212(c)(3) of the Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act,

A Breakdown of Fair Use

Is your small business trying to spruce up your website by adding some new pictures? Want to raise money for your nonprofit by hosting a community movie night? Trying to update your marketing materials with a brand-new promotional video with cool background music? If so, you could be opening yourself up to potential copyright lawsuits and should read up on the doctrine of fair use! An important aspect of starting a small business or nonprofit is exposure, and as organizations work to market themselves and increase awareness of their goals and activities in the communities they serve, they could open themselves up to legal danger. Litigation is expensive, and the cost can be especially devastating to small businesses and nonprofits. In all promotional or informational materials (including brochures, flyers, websites, etc.), organizations need to be sure that they are legally protected from copyright infringement claims.   What is Fair Use? Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits

Michigan Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C): Mixing Social Impact and Profit

              Given the variety of legal structures, it is essential to pick the one that is best for your business and the goals you’ve laid out for them. And, in this age of conscious consumerism, businesses have looked towards merging both societal benefit and profit. [1] With that in mind, businesses are looking towards the sort of entity forms that provide a structure to achieve this dual-pronged purpose. One such entity in particular that has gathered attention is the relatively new statutory business entity the Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) . [2] An L3C is considered an entity for entrepreneurs who “value purpose and profits,” and is intended to provide entrepreneurs with the opportunity to form an entity that caters to both these goals. [3] The L3C is the states’ response to the demand of a growing number of social entrepreneurs that seek to combine the financial benefits of a traditional for-profit entity with the social benefits of a non-profit. [4] While th