Skip to main content

The Ethical and the Economic: Key Considerations for Employing Returning Citizens

 Returning Citizens and Reducing Recidivism

 Each year, over 610,000 individuals are released from state and federal prisons in the United States.  There is an undeniable link between lack of investment in community resources, socioeconomic disparities, and incarceration rates.  Communities of color are disproportionately impacted by incarceration.  For example, Black Michiganders represent roughly 14% of the state’s population, but a staggering 53% of the state’s incarcerated population.

 Many returning citizens face nearly insurmountable barriers to successful reentry into the community, including a lack of stable housing, food, and the skills needed to obtain meaningful employment.  Avoiding recidivism is important for the well-being of these individuals, their families, their communities, and society at large.

Research has shown that landing a job as soon as possible after being released from incarceration is one of the keys to avoiding recidivism.  Even as the U.S. labor market tightens and more than 10 million jobs remain unfilled, the job search can be daunting, and even more so for an individual with a criminal record.  According to the Prison Policy Initiative, returning citizens face unemployment at a rate of over 27% higher than the rest of the population.

 Even if they get through the interview process, returning citizens face an application that likely asks if they have ever been convicted of a felony. For too many businesses, an affirmative answer to that question is an almost automatic disqualifier.  To realize the full economic promise of our neighborhoods, and to rebuild communities impacted by the criminal justice system and blight, we must support the economic mobility of these returning citizens.

 Key Considerations for Employers

 Small businesses and community-based organizations have the power to be at the forefront of employing returning citizens.  Returning citizens have paid their debt to society and deserve a chance to rebuild their own lives and reintegrate into their communities.  Formerly incarcerated people can make great employees—loyal, hard-working, and beneficial. That’s good for business, for the community and for the individuals.



In addition to the benevolent and community-oriented motivations for employing returning citizens, employers should be aware of the legal and economic landscape for doing so.  In particular, programs such as the Work Opportunity Tax Credit and the Federal Bonding Program seek to incentivize hiring returning citizens.

        The Work Opportunity Tax Credit

 The Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) is a federal tax credit available to employers for hiring and employing individuals from certain groups who have faced significant barriers to employment, including those who have previously been incarcerated.  People who are hired within one year of being convicted of a felony or being released from prison for a felony qualify under the program.  WOTC is a general business credit provided under Section 51 of the Internal Revenue Code that is jointly administered by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Department of Labor.

 The WOTC is available for wages paid to eligible individuals who begin work on or before December 31, 2025.  The WOTC may be claimed by any employer that hires and pays or incurs wages.  Employers of all sizes are eligible to claim the WOTC.  This includes both taxable and certain tax-exempt employers located in the United States.  On or before the day that an offer of employment is made, the employer and the job applicant must complete Form 8850 (Pre-Screening Notice and Certification Request for the Work Opportunity Credit).  The employer has twenty-eight calendar days from the new employee’s start date to submit Form 8850 to the designated local agency located in the state in which the business is located (where the employee works).

         Federal Bonding

 The U.S. Department of Labor created the Federal Bonding Program (FBP) in 1966 to provide fidelity bonds to employers that hire vulnerable job seekers, such as those who have been involved with the judicial system, individuals in recovery from a substance abuse addiction, or economically disadvantaged youths and adults who lack work histories.  The bonds issued by the FBP guarantee the job honesty of job seekers to employers that want to hire them. 

 Employers receive the bonds, starting at $5,000 in value, free-of-charge as an incentive to hire these applicants; coverage is provided for the first six months of a selected individual’s term of employment.  The Federal Bonding Program was designed to reimburse the employer for any loss due to theft, forgery, larceny, or embezzlement and can be applied to any job, any employee dishonesty committed on or away from the work site, and any full or part-time employee paid wages.  This program boasts more than 50,000 job placements. Since its inception, bonds have been activated only one percent of the time—a 99 percent success rate.

         Other Legal and Economic Considerations

 Instituting blanket bans on anyone with a criminal record is likely discriminatory.  According to recent revisions of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Guidelines on the subject of using arrest and conviction records with regard to employment, employers should not use a policy or practice that excludes people with certain criminal records if the policy or practice significantly disadvantages individuals of a particular race. Instead of refusing to hire anyone with a criminal background, employers should make individualized assessments based upon the severity of the crime committed, the amount of time that has passed since the crime was committed, and the relevance of the committed criminal conduct to the job. 

Even if not legally impermissible, excluding returning citizens from the workforce has a significantly negative economic impact.  The Center for Economic and Policy Research found that preventing people with a criminal record from fully reentering the workforce costs the U.S. economy between $78 billion and $87 billion in projected economic output.

 Conclusion 

It’s no secret that incarceration damages the vitality of communities by undermining community cohesion and depriving local institutions of a workforce.  According to the Second Chance Business Coalition, 82% of managers report the value second chance employees bring to their organization as high or higher than that of workers without records. Hiring returning citizens also leads to a more diverse workforce by inviting unique perspectives. 

Because state and local governments offer an inconsistent patchwork of resources for employers and returning citizens, this is an area ripe for innovation by small businesses.  By being a part of programs like the Work Opportunity Tax Credit and the Federal Bonding Program, and hiring returning citizens, local entrepreneurs have the chance to address gaps in our current workforce and lead economic development nationwide.

By Rebecca Fisher

For more information, the below are links to helpful resources for Michigan employers seeking to hire returning citizens:

 Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

      Encouraging Returning Citizens Through Workforce Opportunities

Handbooks

      Federal Reentering Your Community, A Handbook

Michigan Jobs for Returning Citizens

      View Job Opportunities by Employers Who Hire Returning Citizens

Work Opportunity Tax Credit

      United States Department of Labor: Work Opportunity Tax Credit

Federal Bonding Program

      The Federal Bonding Program, A US Department of Labor Initiative

      State of Michigan, Fidelity Bonding Program

Michigan Department of Corrections

      Michigan Offender Success / Prisoner Reentry Services

Michigan State Industries Second Chance Employers

      Become a Second Chance Employer

 

Popular posts from this blog

What's in a Name? A Short & Sweet Guide to Michigan's Entity Name Rules

  Part 1: Introduction You have decided to create a business entity in Michigan, congratulations!   One of the most important steps in entity formation is choosing a name—it tells the state and the public a lot about your business.   Maybe you already know what name you want to choose.   Maybe you are overwhelmed by all of the rules you have seen online.   Maybe you fall into both (or neither) of those categories. Keep reading to learn more about what you may and must include in your business’s name, what you cannot include in your business’s name, and where to find additional resources. Part 2: The Dos You May. . .             Often, the name is the first thing consumers see about a business.   Because first impressions are so important, it is a great idea for your business’s name to be a reflection of the service(s) you provide, your business’s mission, or some other related facet of your business. For example, under § 212(c)(3) of the Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act,

A Breakdown of Fair Use

Is your small business trying to spruce up your website by adding some new pictures? Want to raise money for your nonprofit by hosting a community movie night? Trying to update your marketing materials with a brand-new promotional video with cool background music? If so, you could be opening yourself up to potential copyright lawsuits and should read up on the doctrine of fair use! An important aspect of starting a small business or nonprofit is exposure, and as organizations work to market themselves and increase awareness of their goals and activities in the communities they serve, they could open themselves up to legal danger. Litigation is expensive, and the cost can be especially devastating to small businesses and nonprofits. In all promotional or informational materials (including brochures, flyers, websites, etc.), organizations need to be sure that they are legally protected from copyright infringement claims.   What is Fair Use? Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits

Michigan Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C): Mixing Social Impact and Profit

              Given the variety of legal structures, it is essential to pick the one that is best for your business and the goals you’ve laid out for them. And, in this age of conscious consumerism, businesses have looked towards merging both societal benefit and profit. [1] With that in mind, businesses are looking towards the sort of entity forms that provide a structure to achieve this dual-pronged purpose. One such entity in particular that has gathered attention is the relatively new statutory business entity the Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) . [2] An L3C is considered an entity for entrepreneurs who “value purpose and profits,” and is intended to provide entrepreneurs with the opportunity to form an entity that caters to both these goals. [3] The L3C is the states’ response to the demand of a growing number of social entrepreneurs that seek to combine the financial benefits of a traditional for-profit entity with the social benefits of a non-profit. [4] While th