Skip to main content

Building Financial Sustainability Without Mission Drift: Choosing the Right Strategy for Mission and Profit

More nonprofits and mission-driven businesses are looking for ways to stay financially sustainable without drifting from their mission. Many are turning to social enterprise strategies to access more financing sources besides grants and donations. Social enterprise generally refers to adopting hybrid business models: structures that allow organizations to earn revenue and stay true to their mission. These strategies can take many legal forms, including:

·         Traditional 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofits and 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, or a nonprofit’s subsidiary

This post gives an overview of these options.

Low-Profit Limited Liability Companies (L3Cs)

An L3C is a for-profit LLC designed specifically for social impact. Although it earns revenue like any business, it must be created primarily for a socially beneficial purpose. Importantly, earning profits cannot be the significant purpose, and the organization cannot be formed mainly to conduct political or lobbying activities.[1]

Advantages

L3Cs look and operate like normal LLCs—flexible, simple, and able to distribute profits. Their main advantage is that they often fit the requirements for Program-Related Investments (PRIs), which are financial tools (usually loans or equity) used by private foundations. PRIs differ from grants: they must be repaid or generate a return so that foundations can recycle their money into future mission-aligned work. Because L3Cs prioritize a charitable purpose over financial return, they may be strong PRI candidates.

Limitations

L3C status does not guarantee PRI approval by the IRS, and because L3Cs are for-profit, they cannot receive tax-deductible donations. They are also relatively rare, meaning many investors or funders may not understand the model. For these reasons, although the structure exists in several states, it is less common in practice.

Benefit Corporations / Public Benefit Corporations (PBCs) [2]

A Benefit Corporation (or PBC, depending on the state) is a for-profit corporation that legally commits to producing a specific public benefit and operates in a responsible and sustainable manner with respect to workers, communities, and the environment. Unlike traditional corporations, PBC directors must balance three goals:

  1. Financial return to stockholders
  2. A net positive impact on society and the environment
  3. The company’s stated public benefit(s) in its charter

The benefit must be clear, meaningful, and measurable.

Every two years, PBCs must send stockholders a benefit report showing their public benefit objectives, measurement standards, factual progress, and an assessment of the success of the public benefit objectives. Although the benefit report is only required for stockholders, many companies also publish it publicly to showcase their public-benefit work and broader sustainability efforts. PBCs do not need to be certified by a third party, but some companies choose to become Certified B Corporations for branding and market credibility.

Advantages

PBCs can boost branding, help attract mission-driven talent, and signal values to consumers. Some investors—including impact investors, charities, and foundations—may prefer PBCs because they have clearer accountability for social goals.

There is no guidance from legislature or case law on how to balance the different interests of a PBC. However, there is a legal presumption that a director will be deemed to satisfy such director’s fiduciary duties to stockholders and the corporation if the decision at the time was rational, informed, and disinterested (“Business Judgment Rule”).

Limitations

PBC law is still relatively new. Delaware adopted it in 2013, and there is little case law about how to weigh mission against profit. PBC availability varies by state (Michigan’s version is still in bill form), so many founders incorporate in Delaware. Investors may still require education about the structure.

It is generally accepted that PBCs may still pursue strategies focused on financial growth and stockholder value. This can be a benefit—reflecting real-world market pressures—but it can also be a drawback: a PBC may promote its public-benefit mission while primarily seeking shareholder profits, creating risks of greenwashing and undermining public trust.

501(c)(3) Nonprofits

A 501(c)(3) is the most widely recognized type of nonprofit. They are tax-exempt and can receive tax-deductible donations, which makes them attractive to donors and foundations. Their revenue can come from grants, donations, membership fees, tuition or ticket sales, mission-related program revenue, consulting or educational services, and mission-driven business activities such as a museum selling exhibit-related merchandise.[3] As long as the activity is substantially related to the mission, the income is tax-exempt.

Limitations

Income from activities not related to the mission is considered Unrelated Business Taxable Income (UBTI). Occasional UBTI is allowed, but if it becomes substantial, it may:

  • Trigger taxes
  • Risk the organization's tax-exempt status
  • Signal mission drift

501(c)(3)s must also avoid:

  • Private inurement
  • Excessive lobbying
  • Political campaign activity

To safely conduct revenue-generating or higher-risk activities, nonprofits can form subsidiaries. They can form nonprofit subsidiary to isolate the risks associated with the social-enterprise activity, although this approach comes with additional administrative and operational costs. For instance, a community arts nonprofit might create a separate nonprofit entity to run a revenue-generating youth theater program that carries heightened risks, such as safety, employment, or contractual liabilities.[4]

If the planned activity will generate UBTI at or near a substantial level, the nonprofit can form a for-profit subsidiary—such as an LLC or corporation—which is not tax-exempt but effectively shields the parent nonprofit from the subsidiary’s liabilities. This structure allows the nonprofit to pursue revenue-generating ventures without jeopardizing its tax-exempt status.

501(c)(4) Social Welfare Organizations[5]

A 501(c)(4) is a tax-exempt nonprofit focused on promoting social welfare, community well-being, and civic engagement. They have more flexibility to engage in advocacy and policy work than 501(c)(3)s do. Examples include civic organizations, community benefit groups, housing associations, and certain advocacy organizations. Their funding resources can be grants, government funding, donations, and membership dues.

Advantages:

One of the major advantages of a 501(c)(4) is its flexibility in advocacy. Unlike 501(c)(3) charities, a 501(c)(4) may engage in substantial lobbying to influence legislation and public policy. It may also participate in certain political activities—such as supporting or opposing ballot measures or public issues—as long as political campaign intervention does not become its primary activity. This makes the structure especially useful for mission-driven organizations whose work involves policy change.

501(c)(4)s also allow donors to remain anonymous, as these organizations do not have to publicly disclose their contributor lists.

Limitations:

501(c)(4) earnings cannot inure to the benefit of any private person, and although they are tax-exempt, contributions to 501(c)(4)s are generally not tax-deductible as charitable donations.

The legal standard for what counts as promoting “social welfare” can also be ambiguous, and courts have not provided precise guidance on how much community benefit is required. As a result, fundraising, program design, and compliance often require more careful planning than in a traditional 501(c)(3).

Fiscal Sponsorship [6]

Fiscal sponsorship allows a new or temporary project to operate under the umbrella of a 501(c)(3) sponsor, rather than forming a new nonprofit immediately.[7] The sponsor handles administration, receives grants and donations, and pays the project’s expenses through a formal Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement.

The project becomes a fully integrated part of the sponsor, which holds legal and fiduciary responsibility. Project leaders run the programs, while the sponsor ensures compliance, manages funds, and signs contracts.

Advantages

Fiscal sponsorship provides an easier alternative to forming a new nonprofit when a project is small or in its early stages, allowing groups to test their ideas before deciding whether to incorporate later. It also reduces administrative burdens, enabling project leaders—who may have strong program expertise but limited experience with corporate, financial, or tax matters—to operate in a supportive environment.

Projects can receive tax-deductible donations through a 501(c)(3) sponsor, gain access to funding more quickly, and avoid the delays of applying for tax-exempt status. Sponsors often provide additional support such as insurance, payroll, accounting, office space, publicity, fundraising help, and other capacity-building services. In many cases, sponsors can also secure lower insurance rates than a small start-up nonprofit could obtain on its own.

Limitations

The sponsor controls all funds, and the project must fit within the sponsor’s charitable mission. For long-term or large programs, eventually forming a separate nonprofit may be necessary.

 Below is a simple breakdown of the different models—what they are, how they work, and what you should watch out for:


Model

Legal Type

Distribute Profits to Owners?

Tax-Exempt?

Tax-Deductible Donations?

Best For

Key Caution

L3C

For-profit LLC with social purpose

Yes

No

No

Impact-oriented businesses seeking mission-aligned investors, possibly PRIs

Not widely used; no guaranteed PRI approval; investor familiarity is low

Benefit Corporation / PBC

For-profit corporation with stated public benefit

Yes

No

No

For-profits that want to consider impact of business on environment/society beyond stockholder value

Limited case law; risk of “greenwashing”; some investors still skeptical

501(c)(3)

Tax-exempt charity/subsidiary

No (no private inurement)

Yes

Yes

Traditional charities, education, health, arts, etc.

Strict limits on lobbying and political activity; must avoid unrelated business risks

501(c)(4)

Tax-exempt social welfare organization/subsidiary

No (no private inurement)

Yes

No charitable deductions

Advocacy and civic organizations that want more lobbying flexibility

Must promote social welfare; political activity can’t be primary

Fiscal Sponsorship

Project under a 501(c)(3) sponsor

No (sponsor controls funds)

Uses sponsor’s status

Yes (via sponsor)

Early-stage projects testing an idea without forming a new nonprofit

Sponsor controls funds and charges fees; project must align with sponsor’s mission



By Nika Baghestani



[1] MCL - Section 450.4102

[3] See, e.g., Rev. Rul. 73-105; 1973-1 C.B. 264.

[4] Alexander C. Campbell, Social Enterprise for Non-Profits, Baker & Hostetler LLP & Practical Law Corporate & Securities, Practical Law Practice Note W-014-2192.

[7] There are multiple fiscal sponsorship types.  While much of this section applies broadly to all types, the following section is best viewed through the lens of the “Model A” form of fiscal sponsorship.


Popular posts from this blog

A Breakdown of Fair Use

Is your small business trying to spruce up your website by adding some new pictures? Want to raise money for your nonprofit by hosting a community movie night? Trying to update your marketing materials with a brand-new promotional video with cool background music? If so, you could be opening yourself up to potential copyright lawsuits and should read up on the doctrine of fair use! An important aspect of starting a small business or nonprofit is exposure, and as organizations work to market themselves and increase awareness of their goals and activities in the communities they serve, they could open themselves up to legal danger. Litigation is expensive, and the cost can be especially devastating to small businesses and nonprofits. In all promotional or informational materials (including brochures, flyers, websites, etc.), organizations need to be sure that they are legally protected from copyright infringement claims.   What is Fair Use? Fair use is a legal doctrine that per...
Read more

Navigating Liability Across Multiple Ventures for Michigan Businesses: Alternatives to Series LLCs

  The Problem: Managing Liability Across Different Ventures   Many business owners manage multiple ventures. This often entails dealing with different types of risks and liabilities. Whether selling different lines of products or operating multiple services within a business, it is really important to keep liabilities isolated to protect assets. For example, consider a business owner who owns both a restaurant and a catering business. In the event that a customer sued the restaurant for something like a slip-and-fall accident, the owner’s catering business could also be at risk if the ventures are not legally separated. Without proper legal structures, a lawsuit or financial issue affecting one part of the business could easily spill over, putting the entire business at risk. For this reason, business owners should look for ways to separate liability across their ventures and ensure that issues in one area don't threaten the stability and success of the others.   Liab...
Read more

The Bankruptcy Code and Black Business Owners: An Overview on the Racial Disparities that Exist in Bankruptcy Proceedings

"sisyphus paradox."   by   percipio symphony   is licensed under   CC BY 2.0   In a recent podcast for Bloomberg Law, University of Texas at Austin School law professor Mechele Dickerson discussed how the Bankruptcy Code favors white debtors over Black or Latino ones in various ways. [i]   Interviewer : “Is there a racist element in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code?” Professor Dickerson : “Intentional? No. But if you look at the way the Code is structured for human beings that file for bankruptcy, there are clear biases and it so happens that these biases favor a certain profile which I have called in the past an ideal debtor…” [ii]   This is a reality that has not gotten much attention in legal and business communities. Although there have been dozens of studies that have found Black debtors file for bankruptcy disproportionately more than other racial groups (yet get less permanent relief) there has been no definitive answer presented as to why. [iii] ...
Read more